Category Archives: 2025

1939: The Big Sleep by Philip Marlowe

The Big SleepThe Big Sleep
by Raymond Chandler
Rating: ★★★★½
Series: Philip Marlowe #1
Publication Date: February 6, 1939
Genre: noir
Pages: 231
ReRead?: Yes
Project: 2025 read my hoard, a century of crime

When a dying millionaire hires Philip Marlowe to handle the blackmailer of one of his two troublesome daughters, Marlowe finds himself involved with more than extortion. Kidnapping, pornography, seduction, and murder are just a few of the complications he gets caught up in.


It was about eleven o’clock in the morning, mid October, with the sun not shining and a look of hard wet rain in the clearness of the foothills. I was wearing my powder-blue suit, with dark blue shirt, tie and display handkerchief, black brogues, black wool socks with dark blue clocks on them. I was neat, clean, shaved and sober, and I didn’t care who knew it. I was everything a well dressed private detective ought to be. I was calling on four million dollars.

So begins The Big Sleep, the first of the novels featuring Philip Marlowe, the most famous and longest lasting of the hardboiled detectives in the noir tradition. Chandler writes like Hemingway, if I enjoyed Hemingway (and he wrote about crime). He has been imitated so many times that he is almost a parody of himself, except that he is so good.

I think I have read most of the Marlowe books previously, but never with any sort of intention. I have definitely not read Playback, the last of them. Has anyone read it? It never seems to be mentioned and may not be very good. I’m not sure if I’ve read The Little Sister. I’ve definitely read Farewell, My Lovely, The High Window, The Lady in the Lake and The Long Goodbye.

Chandler’s L.A. is a place, a character and a feeling. Nostalgia is a trap, and in the case of Marlowe, it’s a trap that is grimy, well-worn and slightly sordid. I don’t live in L.A., visit it only occasionally, and can barely think of it without thinking of Marlowe and Bosch, two characters that I associate most firmly with it.

The thing about The Big Sleep is that the plot is almost entirely beside the point. Everyone says that Chandler was all about character and place and I believe this to be true. Each sentence is beautifully crafted to convey a feeling – as the reader, I can see his characters; they are archetypes, but they are his archetypes and no one else’s, except for all of the admirers who came after and all of the compatriots who came before but maybe didn’t do it quite so well. I can see the places he writes about, as well, and smell them, and hear them, I can see the outline of the palm tree in the diminishing light, and smell the slightly unpleasant odor of salt water and sewage.

We drove away from Las Olindas through a series of little dank beach towns with shack-like houses built down on the sand close to the rumble of the surf and larger houses built back on the slopes behind. A yellow window shone here and there, but most of the houses were dark. A smell of kelp came in off the water and lay in the fog. The tires sang on the moist concrete of the boulevard. The world was a wet emptiness.

Damn. That is so good.

But, back to the plot, which is convoluted and doesn’t make a whole lot of sense. It is fable at this point that when Chandler was writing the script for the movie adaptation, he was asked about one of the murders and who had committed it because the book overlooked identifying the perpetrator. It is reported that he said that he didn’t know. He had forgotten to resolve the plot point, and no one reading the book seems to have cared very much.

And isn’t it crazy that this book – which feels completely modern – was published 86 years ago.

A Summer of Noir

I often try to theme my summer reading – last year, I did a road trip theme, in which I read a book from a number of different states. This petered a bit, in the end, but was fun while it lasted. Also in years past, I’ve done themed reads around spy fiction/espionage, regency romance and fairy tale retellings.

This year, I’ve settled on mid-century (20th century, of course) noir for my theme. I’ve been in the process of purchasing a number of Library of America collections. So far, I’ve acquired:

  • American Noir: 11 classic crime novels of the ’30’s, ’40’s and ’50’s, which contains the following novels:
    • The Postman Always Rings Twice by James M. Cain
    • They Shoot Horses, Don’t They? by Horace McCoy
    • Thieves Like Us by Edward Anderson
    • The Big Clock by Kenneth Fearing
    • Nightmare Alley by William Lindsay Gresham
    • I Married a Dead Man by Cornell Woolrich
    • The Killer Inside Me by Jim Thompson
    • The Talented Mr. Ripley by Patricia Highsmith
    • Pick-Up by Charles Willeford
    • Down There by David Goodis
    • The Real Cool Killers by Chester Himes
  • Crime Novels of the 1960’s, which contains the following novels:
    • Fredric Brown’s The Murderers (1961), a darkly comic look at a murderous plot hatched on the hip fringes of Hollywood.
    • Dan J. Marlowe’s terrifying The Name of the Game Is Death (1962), about a nihilistic career criminal on the run
    • Charles Williams’s Dead Calm (1963), a masterful novel of natural peril and human evil on the high seas.
    • Dorothy B. Hughes’s The Expendable Man (1963), an unsettling tale of racism and wrongful accusation in the American Southwest.
    • Richard Stark’s taut The Score (1964), in which the master thief Parker plots the looting of an entire city with the cool precision of an expert mechanic.
    • The Fiend (1964), in which Margaret Millar maps the interlocking anxieties of a seemingly tranquil California suburb through the rippling effects of a child’s disappearance.
    • Ed McBain’s classic police procedural Doll (1965), a breakneck story that mixes murder, drugs, fashion models, and psychotherapy with the everyday professionalism of the 87th Precinct.
    • Run Man Run (1966), Chester Himes’s nightmarish tale of racism and police violence that follows a desperate young man seeking safe haven in New York City while being hunted by the law.
    • Patricia Highsmith’s ultimate meta-thriller, The Tremor of Forgery (1969), a novel in which a displaced traveler finds his own personality collapsing as he attempts to write a novel about a man coming undone.
  • Women Crime Writers: 8 Suspense Novels of the 1940’s and 1950’s, which collects:
    • Vera Caspary’s famous career girl mystery Laura;
    • Helen Eustis’s intricate campus thriller The Horizontal Man;
    • Dorothy B. Hughes’s In a Lonely Place, the terrifyingly intimate portrait of a serial killer;
    • Elisabeth Sanxay Holding’s The Blank Wall, in which a wife in wartime is forced to take extreme measures when her family is threatened;
    • Charlotte Armstrong’s Mischief, the nightmarish drama of a child entrusted to a psychotic babysitter;
    • Patricia Highsmith’s brilliant The Blunderer, which tracks the perverse parallel lives of two men driven toward murder;
    • Margaret Millar’s Beast in View, a relentless study in madness;
    • Dolores Hitchens’s Fools’ Gold, a hard-edged tale of robbery and redemption.
  • Raymond Chandler: The Library of America Edition, which contains a number of short stories, and all 7 of his Philip Marlowe novels:
    • The Big Sleep;
    • Farewell, My Lovely;
    • The High Window;
    • The Lady in the Lake;
    • The Little Sister;
    • The Long Goodbye;
    • Playback

There are a few more on my list to purchase (there’s a Ross MacDonald collection that I definitely want, and a Dashiell Hammet collection that I might want), but I have busted my book budget for the month, so it won’t be until at least July that I replenish the coffers.

When I think of noir, I always think of summer. It’s not merely lore, but is reality, that when temperatures soar, tempers fray and the homicide rate goes up. The 4th of July tends to be one of the deadliest days of the year, and there are numerous studies that reflect that, at least in the U.S., we become more violent, more angry and more murderous during our long, hot summers. I’ve long believed that August, not April, is the cruelest month.

This particular reading theme doesn’t just have a literary component, though. A lot of the books I’ll be reading were adapted into well-regarded films, and I plan to watch some of them as I finish the source material.

So, at least part of my long, hot summer will be spent on crime of a very particular sort.

1927: The Tragedy at Freyne

The Tragedy at FreyneThe Tragedy at Freyne
by Anthony Gilbert
Rating: ★★★★
Series: Scott Egerton #1
Publication Date: January 1, 1927
Genre: mystery: golden age (1920-1949)
Pages: 230
ReRead?: No
Project: a century of crime

When Sir Simon Chandos is found poisoned in his library, with a confession in front of him and a phial of morphia tablets on the table at his side, suicide is the obvious deduction. This is a dreadful shock to the members of the house party gathered in his picturesque old Norman country house, Freyne Abbey. But the discovery of a trivial discrepancy, by one of the guests, turns the suspicion in the direction of murder, and from that slight clue the amateur detective, Scott Egerton, unravels the web of an exceptionally brilliant and cold-blooded plot…


Anthony Gilbert was the penname for Lucy Malleson, who also wrote under the name Anne Meredith. The first book I read by her was Portrait of a Murderer, published as Anne Meredith, which was reprinted by British Library Crime Classics to much success in 2017.

The Tragedy at Freyne is the first in her Scott Egerton series, and is a classic British country house closed circle/impossible crime mystery (these are obviously not the same trope – one can have an impossible crime without it being a closed circle, and vice versa, but I don’t want to go into more detail, in an effort to avoid major spoilers).

The set up is a weekend house party* at Freyne manor. The host, Simon Chandos, is found dead in the morning after a night of revelry and drama. There was an effort by the murderer to make it look like Chandos committed suicide, but this is quickly debunked.

The four of us—Bannister, Egerton, Dacre and I—had slept in adjoining rooms the previous night, the other side of the wing being closed, so that the step Miss Dennis had heard might have belonged to any of us, except for the lameness to which she testified. Above our rooms were the servants’ quarters, in a long wing stretching out in an ungainly manner from the side of the house, like a clumsy chicken trying to extend her leg, and fearful of being nipped.

There are a lot of twists and turns in this golden age mystery. There are also a fair few (typical) obnoxious statements about women, like this one:

As far as reason goes women have not progressed much from the stage of the savage whose head can hold only one idea at a time. That’s where men score. They do, as a rule, take the impersonal standpoint; women see life as individuals, and it’s as individuals that they regulate their lives. Law-givers? No sane man wants to see laws made by women. To begin with, not one in ten has a grain of respect for the law she wants to create. Lady Chandos hasn’t; Miss Dennis hasn’t. As for Miss St Claire, I don’t suppose she cares either.

Everytime I read something like this, I laugh out loud, thinking about men in public life who take nothing from the “impersonal” standpoint. But, I digress into politics (Trump. I’m talking about Trump). As a person who reads a lot of vintage fiction, it’s like water off of a duck’s back for me. What’s a woman – who is also a lawyer and a former prosecutor – supposed to do but laugh at this sort of nonsense.

Which brings me to the next point – as a former prosecutor, I often find myself thinking about whether or not the mystery presented wasn’t just solved, but was it also prosecutable? It’s obviously not a requirement that the “case” be prosecutable at the end of the book, but it’s interesting to think about. Many times I conclude that they are not.

This one, I would say, gets a yes from me. There are some solid clues that would make solid, admissible evidence to present in court. There is one piece of evidence related to typewriter print matching that is quite fun. If you remember typewriters, they had very unique characteristics (off kilter, damaged or faded portions of letters, spacing mismatches/issues, etc) that would be able to be linked with absolute certainty. Opportunity with respect to the morphia is well thought out. There is also a clear and compelling motive.

The murderer is a particularly nasty piece of work who leaves quite a path of destruction in (his/her) wake.

This one is available for kindle from Spitfire Publishers Ltd for a mere .99 in the U.S. For fans of golden age mystery, I recommend.

*Sadly, no one has ever invited me to a weekend house party at a manor in the English countryside, with or without murder.

1991: Marking Time by Elizabeth Jane Howard

Back in May, 2017, I bought the Open Road Media omnibus edition of the Cazalet Chronicles for $3.03, which is about half what Starbucks charges for a mocha these days. Over the subsequent eight years, I would occasionally remember that I had it, mostly when Elizabeth Jane Howard’s name came up in a podcast or book I was reading.

It recently moved to the top of the queue, for reasons which are pretty murky. I started by reading the first book in the series, The Light Years, but that year in my project was already occupied by Possession. The following year, 1991, however, was open, so here we are. After reading Marking Time, I took a bit of a hiatus, but started book 3, Confusion, yesterday. I plan to complete the series this summer.

The Light YearsThe Light Years
by Elizabeth Jane Howard
Rating: ★★★★
Series: Cazalet Chronicles #1
Publication Date: January 1, 1990
Genre: historical fiction
Pages: 436
ReRead?: No

The Light Years is the first novel in Elizabeth Jane Howard's bestselling Cazalet Chronicles. Home Place, Sussex, 1937. The English family at home . . . For two unforgettable summers they gathered together, safe from the advancing storm clouds of the Second World War. In the heart of the Sussex countryside these were still sunlit days of childish games, lavish family meals and picnics on the beach. Three generations of the Cazalet family. Their relatives, their children and their servants – and the fascinating triangle of their affairs . . .


Marking TimeMarking Time
by Elizabeth Jane Howard
Rating: ★★★★
Series: Cazalet Chronicles #2
Publication Date: January 1, 1991
Genre: historical fiction
Pages: 496
ReRead?: No
Project: 2025 read my hoard, a century of women

For fans of Downton Abbey, the second volume of the critically acclaimed Cazalet saga takes readers into the lives of an extended British family and their devoted retinue It is 1939, and Hitler has just invaded Poland. The exigencies of wartime will force the Cazalets to make difficult choices as the older children are evacuated from London and settled in Home Place, their longtime Sussex summer estate.

Narrated primarily through the voices of three Cazalet cousins—sixteen-year-old Louise and fourteen-year-old Polly and Clary—Marking Time details the continuing saga of their fathers. With the outbreak of war, Edward is determined to do his part for England. Hugh, crippled in World War I, must sit back and watch other men fight for their country, including his brother Rupert, who enlists and goes missing in action. The Cazalets’ story plays out against the greater drama unfolding on the world stage. Three young girls yearn for the freedom they believe adulthood will confer upon them in this tale of struggle and sacrifice, love and loss, as a new generation of Cazalets makes itself heard. With strong female characters such as the stoic Kitty; her daughter, Rachel, who’s in a relationship with another woman; and the loyal governess Miss Milliment, Marking Time explores the role of women during the war amid early stirrings of feminism.


Overall, I enjoyed both of the first two books. Howard uses a family saga as the framework for understanding the changes in British society as a result of WWII. The Cazalets are a largish family, with three brothers (Hugh, Edward and Rupert) and their wives (Sybil, Villy & Zoe) as the parent generation, and their children, especially their daughters – Polly, Louise and Clary – who are really the narrators of the books. Louise is the oldest of the girls and Polly and Clary are the same age. There are some brothers and babies, but they are really just background. There is also a spinster sister, Aunt Rachel, who plays a prominent role.

The plot summary compares the Cazalet Chronicles to Downton Abbey, but I don’t really agree. I think it’s more similar to The Forsyte Saga, which I read many years ago (possibly time for a reread). The Cazalets are in trade, and while there is generational wealth, they aren’t the aristocracy in the way that the Crawley’s are.

Of the adults, Edward is a truly loathesome character, and is the worst of the bunch. I have grown weary of Louise, but there are valid reasons for her irritating behaviors. Both Clary and Polly are interesting and engaging. The characters are well drawn and compelling, and I really love historical fiction set during WWII.

There are three more books in the series, and I can’t draw final conclusions until I’ve read them all. But, at this point, I’m enjoying the series a lot!

1959: Uncle Paul by Celia Fremlin

Uncle PaulUncle Paul
by Celia Fremlin
Rating: ★★★★
Publication Date: January 1, 1959
Genre: suspense
Pages: 249
ReRead?: No
Project: a century of women

While sisters Meg and Isabel relax with their children on their seaside holiday, their older half-sister Mildred moves into the cottage where her bigamist husband Paul was arrested for the attempted murder of his first wife. First published in 1959 this psychological thriller follows the women as Paul's release from prison makes them ever more unnerved.


I was pointed in the direction of Celia Fremlin by a friend’s Goodreads timeline. It was honestly the cover that made me sit up a take notice – and when I read the plot summary, I was completely sold. I ended up buying a 3 book set of the Faber & Faber reprints, which includes this one, The Hours Before Dawn and The Long Shadow. So far, I’ve only read Uncle Paul. All of the covers are wonderful.

I don’t quite know where to slot this book, genre-wise. It’s not really a crime/mystery. It’s also not really a thriller. It’s fairly suspenseful, but in a 1950’s and 1960’s way, not in a 2020’s way. The pacing is fairly slow, and the ending took me by surprise, but didn’t shock me.

The main character is Meg, the youngest of three sisters, who is basically summoned to the English coast by the middle sister, Isabel, because the oldest sister, Mildred, seems to have taken leave of her senses by renting a dumpy, remote cottage where her imprisoned (bigamist) husband, Uncle Paul, attempted to kill his first wife a decade or so prior. So, yeah, that’s quite the set up.

Meg is a career girl, with a new boyfriend named Freddy, who behaves in some frankly bizarre ways throughout the course of the book. We really aren’t to know what to make of him. And the middle sister, Isabel, is also married to a man in the Navy, and about whom she seems to know basically nothing. Meg seems to be the only character with even a lick of sense or independence.

Once the characters are all assembled at the coast, the suspense begins to build because no one is talking about Uncle Paul, but everyone is thinking about him. Has he been released? Is he looking for revenge on the three sisters who seemingly betrayed him? Is Freddy Uncle Paul in disguise? Is Isabel’s husband Uncle Paul in disguise? Is everyone losing their ever-lovin’ minds (the answer to this is yes).

If you cross Elizabeth Taylor (the author, not the actress) with Patricia Highsmith, you might end up with Celia Fremlin. If that sounds intriguing, check her out.

The Magic Mountain by Thomas Mann

The Magic MountainThe Magic Mountain
by Thomas Mann
Translated from: German
Rating: ★★★½
Publication Date: November 1, 1924
Genre: classic
Pages: 706
ReRead?: No
Project: 2025 Big Reads

In this dizzyingly rich novel of ideas, Mann uses a sanatorium in the Swiss Alps, a community devoted exclusively to sickness, as a microcosm for Europe, which in the years before 1914 was already exhibiting the first symptoms of its own terminal irrationality.

The Magic Mountain is a monumental work of erudition and irony, sexual tension and intellectual ferment, a book that pulses with life in the midst of death.


At the end of 2024, when I was contemplating my 2025 reading plans, I decided that I would select six “big books” (i.e., books that were over 600 pages) to read this year. The six that ended up making the cut were:

  1. Black Lamb and Grey Falcon by Rebecca West
  2. War and Peace by Leo Tolstoy
  3. The Magic Mountain by Thomas Mann
  4. Kristin Lavransdatter by Sigrid Undset (this is actually 3 books, but I bought the omnibus edition, so I’m treating it like 1 book)
  5. Moby Dick by Herman Melville
  6. Martin Chuzzlewit by Charles Dickens

I’ve read to the midpoint of Black Lamb and Grey Falcon, and while I do intend to finish it, I very definitely bogged down. It’s a very long book (1181 pages) and it’s non-fiction/travel/memoir, which is a genre that I find troublesome. My reread of War and Peace, while undocumented at this point, is also complete. I plan to write a post fairly soon.

Which brings me to The Magic Mountain. This is a chunky read, albeit not so chunky as either W&P or BL&GF, at about 700 pages. It took me about a month to read it – I started it on April 28, and finished it on June 1. I found it to be between W&P and BL&GF in terms of readability. I love chunky Victorian era novels with sprawling casts covering epic events, and while W&P wouldn’t be considered “Victorian,” being Russian, it was published during that era. I find that type of novel both enjoyable and readable.

The Magic Mountain is . . . what . . . modernist? Post-modern? I dunno – I’m not a critic and I’m bad at that sort of analysis. Nonetheless, it was an easier lift for me that BL&GF because I do much better with fiction than I do with NF.

It always feels vaguely ridiculous to me to rate a classic book – who am I to decide if The Magic Mountain is one star or five stars? I’m perfectly comfortable rating the newest Michael Connelly, but it seems pompous to start assigning star ratings to books that have already managed to stand the test of time as classics, about which entire additional books have been written by scholars, especially when, as is the case here, I feel like I got about 35% of it. So, there you go. I gave it 3 1/2 stars. Make of that what you will.

Sometimes I read a book and I think I will get a lot more out of this when I reread it. In the case of The Magic Mountain, I’m sure that I would get a lot more of it, if I reread it. Nonetheless, I doubt that I will ever reread it. It was too internal, too ambiguous, too “think-y” for my taste. I’m not a reader that requires action or a lot of plot, but I am a reader who wants to feel like the characters could be real people. This book felt like a giant allegory, where ideas were given flesh and turned into characters expressing archetypes, and, unfortunately, I neither enjoyed nor was I interested in the allegory or the archetypes. To say that nothing happened in the first 600 pages is accurate. Mann’s use of time is interesting, from a technical standpoint, but, at the end of the day, I just found the whole thing vaguely annoying.*

So, I’m glad that I read it. It wasn’t a struggle, and I never felt compelled to set it down, but this was a one-off for me.

George Packer, who writes for The Atlantic, and who also wrote a book that I really liked when I read it in 2020 (The Unwinding: An Inner History of the New America) wrote a piece about The Magic Mountain for the centenary last November, which I thought was great, even though he got a lot more out of the book than I did. So, if you want to read a different perspective, you can find it here.

*Having said this, I did find it interesting that the arguments between Settembrini and Naphta were sort of like listening to Ezra Klein argue with Steve Bannon. So, there is a relevance here.

Framley Parsonage by Anthony Trollope

Framley ParsonageFramley Parsonage
by Anthony Trollope
Rating: ★★★★½
Series: Chronicles of Barsetshire #4
Publication Date: January 1, 1860
Genre: classic
Pages: 580
ReRead?: Yes
Project: classics club round 2

Mark Robarts is a clergyman with ambitions beyond his small country parish of Framley. In a naive attempt to mix in influential circles, he agrees to guarantee a bill for a large sum of money for the disreputable local Member of Parliament, while being helped in his career in the Church by the same hand. But the unscrupulous politician reneges on his financial obligations, and Mark must face the consequences this debt may bring to his family.=

One of Trollope's most enduringly popular novels since it appeared in 1861, Framley Parsonage is an evocative depiction of country life in nineteenth-century England, told with great compassion and acute insight into human nature.


I completed my first read of the Chronicles of Barchester around a decade ago, in 2014-2-15. I remember thoroughly enjoying the experience, so, when a Goodreads friend mentioned she would be reading it in March, I decided to jump on board.

I, again, thoroughly enjoyed the reading experience. So much, that I’m going to reread the rest of the series, except for The Warden, which I reread last year, starting with Barchester Towers.

This book centers on a young vicar, Mark Robarts, who has the living at Framley. He is a youthful 26 years old, and is friends with Lord Lufton, whose mother, the managing Lady Lufton, has strong ideas about what everyone else should do. Particularly Lord Lufton.

The chapters that focus on Mark are intensely uncomfortable. He gets himself mixed up with a wastrel named Mr. Sowerby, which creates serious risks to his financial security and reputation. So many times I wanted to grab him by the shoulders and yell at him to stop being stupid.

Trollope is such a gifted writer. He occasionally breaks the fourth wall and speaks directly to the reader in a confiding and warm way. I became very attached to many of his characters, especially Lucy Robarts, sister of Mark, who is a lovely and worthy young woman. His marriage plots are fraught and provide genuine tension.

When I am reading Trollope, I wonder why I am not always reading Trollope. I like him so much more than Dickens.

CC Spin #40 – The List

 

I managed to complete CC Spin #39, so on the heels of that success, I’m spinning again! Here are my 20:

  1. The Age of Innocence by Edith Wharton
  2. Vera by Elizabeth von Arnim
  3. Mrs. Dalloway by Virginia Woolf
  4. Young Anne by Dorothy Whipple
  5. Quicksand by Nella Larsen
  6. Framley Parsonage by Anthony Trollope
  7. His Excellency Eugene Rougon by Emile Zola
  8. Ripley’s Game by Patricia Highsmith
  9. Brighton Rock by Graham Greene
  10. The Tortoise and the Hare by Elizabeth Jenkins
  11. Inspector Imanishi Investigates by Seicho Matsumoto
  12. The Horizontal Man by Helen Eustis
  13. The Blank Wall by Elisabeth Sanxay Holding
  14. Fools’s Gold by Dolores Hitchens
  15. The Blunderer by Patricia Highsmith
  16. Epitaph for a Spy by Eric Ambler
  17. The 39 Steps by John Buchan
  18. Stoner by John Williams
  19. New Grub Street by George Gissing
  20. Things Fall Apart by Chinua Achebe

 

1971: The Day of the Jackal by Frederick Forsyth

The Day of the JackalThe Day of the Jackal
by Frederick Forsyth
Rating: ★★★★½
Publication Date: June 1, 1971
Genre: espionage
Pages: 434
ReRead?: No
Project: 2025 read my hoard, a century of crime

He is known only as “The Jackal”—a cold, calculating assassin without emotion, or loyalty, or equal. He’s just received a contract from an enigmatic employer to eliminate one of the most heavily guarded men in the world—Charles De Gaulle, president of France.

It is only a twist of fate that allows the authorities to discover the plot. They know next to nothing—only that the assassin is on the move. To track him, they dispatch their finest detective, Claude Lebel, on a manhunt that will push him to his limit, in a race to stop an assassin’s bullet from reaching its target.


I decided to read this after finishing the Peacock adaptation starring Eddie Redmayne and Lashana Lynch, which my husband and I watched last month.

I had some fairly significant frustrations with the series, most importantly, I found basically the entire plot to be unworkable. Without going into too many spoilers, the entire series revolves around the release of some kind of a digital app that is going to drop on a specific date & at a specific time, and that a bunch of bad billionaires, including one played by Charles Dance (damn, can that man inhabit the evil rich dude character), want to derail because it is somehow going to reveal their financial chicanery to the normie plebes. They hire the Jackal to commit an impossible assassination.

My problem with the plot, and it’s a biggie, is that there is absolutely NO REASON EVER GIVEN as to why the irritating, Musk-ish, tech guy – who knows that he is the target of an assassination plot – doesn’t just release it early and make his assassination irrelevant.

Also, by the way, this iteration of the Jackal is the most incompetent master assassin of all time. The showrunner’s desire to humanize him really got in the way of him being convincing as the worlds greatest assassin. And the agent hunting him, played by Lashana Lynch, is no better, and may actually  be worse. Anyway, I kind of enjoyed it, but it mostly annoyed me.

So, moving on to the book! After I decided that I would go back to the source material, I checked my kindle library and sure enough, I already owned it. This happens to me with somewhat embarrassing regularity – I bought it in June, 2018, probably because I thought my dad might want to reread it. I think it might have been be a reread for me as well, but if it was, I read it at least 35 years ago, and remembered nothing of it. There was no sense of background familiarity as I read.

The book is far superior, in my opinion. It doesn’t suffer at all from the plot problems of the television series. It’s a very engaging and believable spy thriller that relies on a lot of historical detail about the relationship between the target of the assassination – French President Charles De Gaulle – and the assassins – his former officers in the OAS who become disillusioned when he withdraws from Algeria, a former French colony. The Jackal is convincing as a baddie, but doesn’t quite reach anti-hero status – he is utterly amoral and ruthless. The French police officer hunting him is a very compelling character, and displays a lot of the best characteristics of law enforcement. He is humble and persistent, never flamboyant or attention-seeking.

The last 100 pages or so are absorbing. I really wasn’t sure how the book would end, so the tension was thick right up to the last moments.

I really love vintage spy thrillers – every time I read one, I want to read more.

1968: Slouching Towards Bethlehem by Joan Didion

Slouching Towards BethlehemSlouching Towards Bethlehem
by Joan Didion
Rating: ★★★½
Publication Date: January 1, 1968
Genre: essays
Pages: 256
ReRead?: No
Project: a century of women

The first nonfiction work by one of the most distinctive prose stylists of our era, Slouching Towards Bethlehem remains, forty years after its first publication, the essential portrait of America— particularly California—in the sixties. It focuses on such subjects as John Wayne and Howard Hughes, growing up a girl in California, ruminating on the nature of good and evil in a Death Valley motel room, and, especially, the essence of San Francisco's Haight-Ashbury, the heart of the counterculture.


I haven’t read very much non-fiction for this project, which might be a bit of an oversight. However, when I was looking for a book for 1968, I noticed that this one qualified.

I have not read much by Joan Didion and have always been vaguely bemused by her cultural importance because her body of work seems insubstantial to me. I did read her memoir The Year of Magical Thinking last year for a book club that ended up getting cancelled, and, while I didn’t dislike it, I didn’t find it to be some sort of grief rosetta stone, worthy of the hype.

So, I went into this with minimal expectations. And, overall, that’s about where I ended up. There were certain essays that really resonated – I especially liked the one about keeping a notebook.

“See enough and write it down, I tell myself, and then some morning when the world seems drained of wonder, some day when I am only going through the motions of doing what I am supposed to do… on that bankrupt morning I will simply open my notebook and there it will all be, a forgotten account with accumulated interest, paid passage back to the world out there…”

I thought that the title essay was very good, although the poem that lent it the title is better. The essay about Hawaii, I found weird, and ill-fitting to the collection overall.

The essays that touched on L.A. in the 1960’s were the most interesting to me, from a purely historical perspective.

“The future always looks good in the golden land, because no one remembers the past.”

And quotes from her piece on the Santa Ana winds have been everywhere recently, with the fires in L.A.

“It is hard for people who have not lived in Los Angeles to realize how radically the Santa Ana figures in the local imagination. The city burning is Los Angeles’s deepest image of itself; Nathanael West perceived that, in The Day of the Locust; and at the time of the 1965 Watts riots what struck the imagination most indelibly were the fires. For days one could drive the Harbor Freeway and see the city on fire, just as we had always known it would be in the end. Los Angeles weather is the weather of catastrophe, of apocalypse, and, just as the reliably long and bitter winters of New England determine the way life is lived there, so the violence and the unpredictability of the Santa Ana affect the entire quality of life in Los Angeles, accentuate its impermanence, its unreliability. The wind shows us how close to the edge we are.”

Anyway, I remain somewhat bemused by her cultural importance, but Didion can definitely construct a sentence.